Cash tied to lease security
Existing deposits and cash-backed guarantees can commit capital while a business occupies its premises.
A proposed approach to commercial lease security — helping Australian businesses consider a different use for the cash behind their next space.
YOUR BUSINESS. YOUR NEXT MOVE.Illustrative architectural imageryCFB is developing its offering. This presentation describes a proposed business and illustrative forecasts; it is not a product offer or an investment commitment.
CFB’s proposition starts with these connected decisions.
Existing deposits and cash-backed guarantees can commit capital while a business occupies its premises.
A new location or expansion brings fitout decisions alongside rent, inventory and operating costs.
Tenants, landlords, brokers and funding providers need a clear process and acceptable terms.
Proposition drawn from the supplied CFB business plan and website material. Individual lease, security and finance arrangements vary.
Begin with the business and its premises, then assess the proposed structure with the parties who need to agree.
Explore a potential alternative to existing cash deposits or bank guarantees, or security for a new lease.
Discuss potential funding for the space itself, with finance principal supplied by an external lending partner.
Source: supplied CFB planning material and current public website. Provider agreements and product terms are still to be confirmed.
The Lean Core scenario assumes an 85% Core / 15% Prime bond mix. Emerging tenants are excluded from this reference scenario.
Planned geography: Sydney first, then Melbourne and Brisbane. Prime and Core are internal model tiers, not external credit ratings. The 85% / 15% mix is an assumption, not a customer or issuance record.
City of Sydney local government area, 2022 survey. A concentrated base for testing referral-led distribution.
Same City of Sydney survey, across business sectors. Includes space that is not leased or suitable for CFB.
Sydney CBD, July 2026. A separate office-market measure that highlights leasing conditions and tenant risk.
Proposed entry focus: established tenants signing, renewing or reviewing security, reached through leasing agents, finance brokers and advisers.
Sources: City of Sydney Floor Space and Employment Survey 2022 (published November 2024); Property Council July 2026 Office Market Report, p20. Rounded from 16,652,587 m². Vacancy uses Sydney CBD geography and is not a lease-transaction or demand count. Strategy is a CFB proposal. Research: 13 October 2026.
Australia, June 2026. Comprises 232,912 businesses with 5–19 staff and 68,325 with 20–199.
Australia, June 2026. A broader population that includes firms with home-based or owned premises.
Property Council surveyed office markets, July 2026. Market conditions reinforce the need for selective credit assessment.
Proposed expansion: prove Sydney referral economics and landlord acceptance, then test Melbourne and Brisbane with funded issuance capacity.
Sources: ABS Counts of Australian Businesses, June 2026 (released 18 August 2026, 5–199 total calculated from employment bands); Property Council July 2026 Office Market Report, p2. ABS counts businesses, not leased premises. Sydney–Melbourne–Brisbane sequence: CFB East Coast market plan v2. Research: 13 October 2026.
The Lean Core mix implies $122,500 of average security and $6,362.50 in annual gross fees per active bond, at current prices.
| Active bonds | Security face value | Annual gross bond fees |
|---|---|---|
| 100 | $12.25m | $0.64m |
| 500 | $61.25m | $3.18m |
| 1,000 | $122.50m | $6.36m |
Calculation: 85% Core at $100k × 5.5% and 15% Prime at $250k × 4.5%. Assumes a full year in force, before escalation.
Source: CFB financial model v9, Lean Core preset, 13 October 2026. Face value is contingent exposure, not revenue or required cash backing. Excludes establishment fees, fitout income, tax and GST. Eligibility, landlord acceptance and acquisition are unproven.
| Market | Published scale context | Opportunity and entry constraint |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 617,330 enterprisesFebruary 2025 · provisional | Adjacent-market pilot. Bank bonds already serve commercial leases. Validate local issuer and landlord terms. |
| England & Wales | 2.14m rateable propertiesNon-domestic local lists · March 2026 | A large property base for a UK entry study. Establish local distribution permissions and accepted wording. |
| Singapore | 371,000 enterprisesCalendar 2025 | Focused retail pilot. The qualifying-lease Code permits up to 50% non-cash security with advance notice, in the landlord’s chosen format. |
| United States | 8.36m employer establishments2023 | Later scale opportunity. Commercial lease surety exists, including Chubb. Start with a local licensed partner and selected states. |
Scale: Stats NZ; HMRC; SingStat; US Census. Entry context: NZ business guidance, Singapore FTIC Code §8.4, Chubb. Accessed 13 October 2026. No overseas revenue enters CFB forecasts.
| Provider / category | Published structure and fees | Implication for CFB |
|---|---|---|
| eGuaranteeDirect lease-bond competitor | Insurer-backed, no cash collateral, subject to assessment. Typically 5.5% p.a. below $200k, plus establishment and possible legal fees. | Cash release and digital delivery already exist. CFB must demonstrate a specific customer or service advantage. |
| AMP / MyGuaranteeCash-backed bank guarantee | Applicant deposit secures the guarantee. Advertised $0 onboarding, application and ongoing fees. | A strong explicit-fee benchmark. Customer value depends on the cost and use of committed cash. |
| CommBankBank guarantee | Cash or eligible property security. Cash-secured up to $1m: 2.5%–3.0% p.a., minimums and establishment fees apply. | Banks can offer more than cash-only security. Compare interest earned, collateral and total customer cost. |
| WestpacBank guarantee | Cash or eligible non-cash security. Cash-secured up to $1.5m: 2.5%–3.0% p.a., minimums and $250 establishment apply. | Pricing and acceptance provide an incumbent benchmark. No blanket claim of faster or cheaper CFB delivery. |
Provider sources, accessed 13 October 2026: eGuarantee, AMP, CommBank, Westpac, Deposit Power, Leap, LeaseLock. Published terms are not binding quotes. Eligibility, expiry, interest and full charges affect comparisons. This review is not exhaustive.
Begin with the model’s Core and Prime segments. Validate security sizes, fees and credit appetite against actual leases.
Proof requiredQualified enquiries that become accepted, issued bonds.
One enquiry can start a lease-security discussion and a separate partner-finance assessment.
Proof requiredWritten lender terms and measured customer uptake.
Use leasing agents and brokers to reach tenants when lease terms and security are being negotiated.
Proof requiredRepeat referrals, turnaround times and landlord acceptance.
Source: CFB business plan v0.3, East Coast market plan v2 and current financial scenarios. Strategic hypotheses, not verified customer outcomes. Digital intake and cash-free security already exist in competing offers.
| Income stream | How the model works | What must be agreed |
|---|---|---|
| Bond fees | Annual fees and establishment income on issued bonds, with ongoing servicing. | Customer pricing, provider terms and landlord acceptance. |
| Fitout referrals | Origination and trail income when a lending partner funds a customer’s fitout. | Written referral terms, lender approval and actual settlement. |
| Backing capital | Capital supports bond capacity and claims. It is accounted for separately from operating funding. | Facility availability, liquidity, claim mechanics and capital costs. |
The current model deducts claims, provider/fronting costs, referral costs, overheads, marketing and contingency. Funding receipts are capital, not revenue. Fitout lending is not needed for the Lean Core reference result.
Leasing agents, brokers, accountants, fitout contractors and franchisors.
Public website and targeted marketing introduce the proposition and capture questions.
Enquiries enter the CRM for qualification, notes and follow-up.
Confirm suitability, provider availability and accepted terms before proceeding.
Distribution figures are planning assumptions, not signed partners or demonstrated conversion. Website enquiries currently feed into CFB’s CRM. The model separately includes paid acquisition.
In-house technology development in Year 1, with the website, lead capture and CRM forming the initial workflow.
New employee allocations are capped at 0.5 FTE per hire through month 36. Existing half-time allocations stay half-time.
The current model retains founder remuneration from month 13 and the existing salary assumptions.
Lean Core employee headcount reaches 0 / 0.5 / 1 / 1.5 / 2 FTE at each year end, excluding founders.
Illustrative model · AUD · GST not modelled · Nov 2026–Oct 2031. The $20,000 Year 1 technology budget replaces the old setup and recurring technology allowance; later costs follow the scenario. Staffing and start dates are planning inputs.
Each scenario is conditional on partner production, fee acceptance, claims experience and substantial backing availability.
| Five-year scenario | Lean Core specialist | Prime tenant channel | Bonds + partner fitout |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total earned revenue | $13.75m | $13.35m | $16.37m |
| Earned operating profit after contingency, before tax | $1.60m | $1.16m | $1.85m |
| Sustained monthly profit starts | Month 29 | Month 30 | Month 29 |
| Primary backing by Year 5 | $42.0m | $47.0m | $49.5m |
On smaller screens, swipe the table to compare all three scenarios.
Illustrative model · AUD · GST not modelled · Nov 2026–Oct 2031 · not actual results. Source: current CFB model v9 presets, 13 October 2026. Figures rounded. Sustained monthly profit requires 12 consecutive profitable months. All cases lose money in Years 1–2.
Earned revenue · AUD millions
Earned operating profit after contingency · AUD
| Year 1 | ($162k) |
|---|---|
| Year 2 | ($314k) |
| Year 3 | $74k |
| Year 4 | $633k |
| Year 5 | $1.37m |
Cumulative earned profit turns positive in the model. Cash receipts and earned revenue follow different timing.
Illustrative model · AUD · GST not modelled · Nov 2026–Oct 2031 · not actual results. Current Lean Core scenario, with no fitout income. Profit is before tax and after contingency. Year 1 and Year 2 operating losses precede modelled profit.
Supports the operating company. The scenario also models approximately $72k of founder contributions in Year 1.
An operating investment assumption, not a committed round or a substitute for bond backing.
The bond book requires committed backing as issuance grows. The reference scenario’s annual capital plan is:
Backing availability, concentration limits and claims liquidity govern issuance capacity. Backing does not automatically confer operating-company shares.
Illustrative model · AUD · GST not modelled · Nov 2026–Oct 2031 · not actual results. Capital is planned, not secured. Valuation and dilution remain scenario-dependent. Funding receipts are excluded from earned profit.
CFB’s proposed structure retains claims risk. A cluster of defaults can erode backing.
Release gate: Approved underwriting, tenant and sector caps, manual exceptions and independent loss stress tests.
A bond may require payment before tenant recovery or term-deposit maturity.
Release gate: Drawable cash, top-up triggers and issuance stops tested against contractual payment deadlines.
Funding, fronting and excess-of-loss terms may be unavailable or withdrawn.
Release gate: Executed, funded agreements covering limits, exclusions, run-off and enforceable draw rights.
A landlord may reject the issuer or bond wording, regardless of tenant demand.
Release gate: Written acceptance from pilot landlords and a tested issue, claim, recovery and release process.
Proposed CFB controls informed by the business plan and APRA capital guidance, reinsurance guidance and NSW retail lease guidance. Prudential standards apply to the relevant regulated insurer; they do not determine CFB’s legal status. Research: 13 October 2026.
Direct issue, retained risk and fronting can create different regulatory obligations.
Release gate: Written legal analysis for each risk-bearing entity and required licences or representative arrangements.
Public site access must not imply unrestricted access to customer records or credit information.
Release gate: Explicit staff roles, record-isolation tests, permitted credit-data use, privacy notices and incident response.
Cash released is not the same as customer savings. Fees and reimbursement obligations matter.
Release gate: Reviewed quotes and marketing with evidence for claims, material conditions and full cost comparisons.
Partner production, fee acceptance and the proposed fitout benefit are unproven.
Release gate: A bounded pilot measuring issuance, acquisition cost, repeat referrals and contribution after claims and capital costs.
Sources: ASIC AFS licensing, credit licensing, APRA authorisation, OAIC credit information, privacy principles, ACCC claims guidance. Proposed gates, not a legal determination or completed approvals. Research: 13 October 2026.
Confirm the legal structure, provider arrangements, backing facility, claims process and required approvals.
Test proposed wording, annual fees and willingness to replace existing security with the relevant parties.
Validate launch partners, qualified enquiries and issued bonds against the model’s monthly assumptions.
Test default losses, delayed recoveries, concentration and available cash before increasing exposure.
Illustrative model · AUD · GST not modelled · Nov 2026–Oct 2031 · not actual results. Downside source: current model v9; approximately $697k additional operating funding after modelled founder funding and seed. Milestones are proposed; approvals and counterparties are not represented as secured.
We’re opening conversations with commercial tenants, landlords, referral partners and potential capital providers.
This presentation is for discussion. Product availability, pricing, provider arrangements, landlord acceptance and funding remain subject to assessment and agreement. Financial outputs are illustrative scenarios based on current assumptions; they are not promises of return. Architectural imagery is illustrative.